Family (with little Bavarian)

I’m on my way to work, but since we so rarely take family photos, I thought I’d post this from T’s Oma’s 60th birthday:

Grothoffs - now with more Lederhosen!

Grothoffs - now with more Lederhosen!

After the ladies decided he was a cute little Bavarian boy (we weren’t in Bavaria at the time), he proclaimed that he was only Bavarian if he had the hat on, and that he was American if he did not.

But he did sing Bavarian drinking songs at the table ;)

Anyhow, I’m not bending over in this picture (though Christian is), so you can see that my 4-year-old will soon be taller than me. Be afraid :)

Posted in Life | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Great. I hate having money. That’s why I became an academic in the first place.

I already tweeted this, but @FakeElsevier‘s “Elsevier Video Guide for Authors ” cracks me up. (And also, in all seriousness, explains the backlash against Elsevier (and much of the rest of the academic publishing industry) by authors and reviewers quite well.)

Elsevier Video Guide for Authors
by: fakeelsevier

(Full disclosure: I’m a signatory to both the Cost of Knowledge and Research Without Walls pledges.)

Posted in Academia | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Round-Tummy Princess: The Movie

Yeah, yeah, this is lame, but I was sort of amused messing around with Xtranormal – a dramatisation of Torsten’s “Round-Tummy Princess” conversation

The Round-Tummy Princess
by: kristamonster

Posted in Life, Silliness | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The proof is in the pie

A colleague of mine is convinced I cannot even make a pie.

As such, I am forced to bring these to work in celebration of my birthday to share. Let this serve as photographic evidence that there is indeed pie, should I be mugged and killed on the U-Bahn in the morning:

Cherry:

20120220-122733.jpg

Apple and blueberry:

20120220-122752.jpg

Yes, these are as yet uncooked in the photos, but I think they serve as sufficient evidence of my ability to make pie.

So there ;)

Posted in Life | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments

Princess Round-Tummy

Torsten: <pokes my belly in my half-dressed state and giggles>

Me: Heeeey… don’t poke me. <ruffles hair>

Torsten: Mama, are you gonna get a small tummy? I want you to have a tummy that’s as flat as mine. <proceeds to show me his indeed very flat tummy>

Me: <sighs> Well, kiddo, I want to try to have a smaller tummy, but I don’t think it’ll ever be that flat. And maybe I’ll need your help, ok?

Torsten: Ok. I love you, Mama. You’re my princess.

Me: Awww, even if I have a round tummy?

Torsten: Of course. My princesses can have round tummies. And I am the prince, ok?

Me: Ok, love.

Me to self, in head: Remember this when he’s sixteen and totally embarrassed by you…

Posted in Life | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Adieu, Facebook, Adieu

I swore I was never going to get involved with Facebook.

For a long time, I resisted. This was partly for privacy reasons (though ironically, one of the people who in the end convinced me to sign up through multiple invites was one of my favorite InfoSec professors), but mostly it was because I didn’t want my information overload problem to get any worse.

Call it my fear of artificially induced A.D.D.

And when an old-school lifelong friend of mine tried to talk me into it, I resisted that too, at least initially. But then, after finding out how much of my high school class was online and knowing my twenty-year reunion was coming up, I succumbed. And as much as aspects of it annoyed me, being able to talk to wonderful people I hadn’t seen in decades was great.

Email requires consciously contacting people. Facebook was like passing people in the hallway and getting a little window on their lives – the choice to comment (or not) was mine. And, to be quite honest, it’s allowed me some RL opportunities that not being on Facebook wouldn’t have (mostly, the chance to see old friends who wouldn’t have known where I was otherwise as they passed through Denver or Munich).

There’s a reason even rational people sell their attention and privacy to Mark Zuckerberg.

That doesn’t make a good idea, but there’s a reason for it.

In this world where we all abandon the villages which would have helped us become adults, raise our children, be families, and grow old together, in some sense, Facebook allows us to reconstruct those villages, if imperfectly. I see my friends’ kids grow from across an ocean, get parenting advice from old friends, laugh with people I love. Especially in my situation, where my meager support system was completely obliterated by moving to another continent and where the language around me isn’t the one I dream in, it’s had particular value.

But… I know better.

Facebook’s sole interest in keeping your information private begins and ends with keeping you around so that they can sell your attention and your data. (This is the same, let’s face it, for any “free” service provider – *ahem* Google *cough*) If the pull of the relationships you’re maintaining is much stronger than your desire to keep your information private – or if the policy is confusing enough that you think your information is private when it isn’t – you’ll stick around, and they can continue doing whatever they do with your data. And given that they change their privacy policies on a daily basis, well, generally, Facebook wins that battle.

I’m a smart girl – I know better – and yet I know I’ll lose touch with some people I adore when I leave.

It’s not their fault – life is incredibly busy, and while you may love browsing the pictures of your high school locker partner when you can do it casually, contacting her directly is work. After a long day of work and kids and commutes and blah blah blah, who needs more work? Sometimes, reading a whole blog post seems like work.

Of course, that’s probably because we’ve all had our attention spans shattered by reading mass quantities of Twitter and Facebook updates. I find myself skimming posts because of it that I would have read before. In fact, I’m going to be shocked if anyone reads this far.

But.

Rationality has to win out eventually. I hope – I sincerely hope – friends will still make contact with me once I’ve deleted my Facebook account tonight. I know lots of folks will try to talk me out of it, but it’s the right thing to do. Call it reallocation of attention and an attempt to control which information Facebook owns about me in the future.

(N.B. Even if Facebook claims (and I don’t know that they even do) to delete all information associated with an account, one would be a fool to believe they actually do.)

Look, as a person, I’m actually not all that private, but I am intensely aware of what I make public when I tweet or post here. But because Facebook feels like you’re having private conversations with your closest 300 friends, you tend to have the private conversations you wouldn’t have on public channels. And Facebook has – and keeps – all of that information.

Not good.

It’s the price you’re paying to chat with your bandmate from senior year.

So: much as I am going to miss contact with friends, I’m deleting my account. I need – and want – to reallocate my attention away from Facebook.

I’m not disappearing from the Internet – I’m not even completely avoiding Short Attention Span Theater (i.e. I’ll still be on Twitter) – but I’m going to delete my Facebook account for good.

So, old pals, if you’ve read this far (or you find this post later) and you still want to find me…

Blog: http://blog.kgrothoff.org
Website: http://kgrothoff.org
Email: krista at kgrothoff dot org
Twitter: @kristamonster

Skype and RL phone calls on request (the latter cost me nothing in a large part of the world), snail mail address available if you email me.

I’ll delete the account late tonight CEST. I have very mixed feelings, but I’ve been threatening to do this for more than a year and never go through with it. No, I don’t think I’m so important that this has a major impact on anyone’s life, but there are some beloved people with whom I have only maintained contact with through Facebook that I don’t want to disappear from without a trace.

N.B. I’m well aware there are other alternatives developing out there – Diaspora, for one. We’ll see. And Twitter has its own issues, but that’s for another post.

Posted in Life, Tech drivel | Tagged , , , , , | 9 Comments

Grammar Biatch: “operating system–specific” (preceding a noun)

I spend an awful lot of time editing other people’s technical text. Some of it is my job, some of it is service (reviewing for journals), and some of it is out of the goodness of my black, black heart.

For years, though, one phrase has taunted me. Forgive me for being pedantic, but the story goes like this:

Your computer is running an operating system right now. It may be GNU/Linux, or OS/X[1], or Windows, or OpenSolaris (though probably not), or whatever.

And sometimes, when you’re talking about something, you want to say it is specific to a particular operating system, rather than generically true. For example, there may be a bug in an application which runs under both Linux and Windows, but the bug only occurs under Windows, so that bug is specific to the Windows operating system.

That is, it is an operating system–specific bug.

If you’re like me, seeing it described that way gives you the heebie-jeebies, because you think there should be some hyphens somewhere in the phrase “operating system–specific”, but that just looks wrong.

Operating system specific bug? Operating-system-specific bug? Operating-system specific bug?

Argh no no no no no.

I have all of the coursework necessary for a PhD in linguistics, thankyouverymuch, and for years I still couldn’t quite figure out how to describe that.

I think the Chicago Manual of Style has sorted it out for me, finally – from section 6.80, “En dashes with compound adjectives”:

The en dash can be used in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of its elements consists of an open compound or when both elements consist of hyphenated compounds … [I]t is intended to signal a more comprehensive link than a hyphen would. It should be used sparingly, and only when a more elegant solution is unavailable.

(Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition, section 6.80, p. 332)

Unfortunately, the example which most closely corresponds to my problem (p. 333: “country music-influenced lyrics”) — that is, a compound adjective whose first element is an open compound (here: “country music”; in my case, “operating system”) — is also the most awkward of the examples given. However, the shoe fits.

If we’re just talking about systems, or we refer to the operating system as the OS, it’s pretty clear: system-specific, OS-specific. Normal hyphenation (and hyphens) work just fine for the compound adjectives here, and most English speakers, I think, would agree that they are correct (“system-specific bugs“, “an OS-specific implementation“).

I’m not going to get into the morass surrounding hyphenation of simple compound modifiers here — you’ll have to take my word for it (or have a peek at CMoS section 7.77–85) — but here, the goal is to make the bindings between words more apparent. Above, we’re talking about bugs which are specific to a particular system, not emphasizing specific bugs. So the real goal is to bind the first element strongly to “specific”.

Having the open compound as the first element, however, creates confusion, or at least stylistic discomfort.

The en dash is slightly longer than a hyphen: “-” vs “–”. I’ve admittedly never paid any attention to it (nor really to its evil cousin, the em dash (“—”), though I at least was aware the em dash existed and what it was sometimes used for), other than the fact that LaTeX represents three kinds of hyphens/dashes and I always have to think about which one I’m supposed to use[2].

Apparently, though, this is the answer to my problem – that is, binding the open compound element (operating system) to the adjective which would normally appear as a hyphenated compound (X-specific) before the noun it modifies. I don’t think it will make readers happier, since I doubt I’m the only one who would not have recognized an en dash if it bit my oversized hindquarters, but apparently my answer is operating system–specific. Not operating system-specific, not operating-system-specific, and not operating-system specific.

It’s not entirely satisfying, but at least it’s an answer I can buy for the moment. (CS people I’m editing for in the future, take note… ;) )

My real advice would be to use OS-specific <noun> where you can, since that’s a common usage and avoids the readability problem, but it does have a degree of informality to it, and so if you must use “operating system–specific”, you can at least give a reason for your choice of punctuation.

  1. [1] Edit: Susi rightly points out that I am a dork for calling it iOS, though in my defense, I try very hard not to think too hard about Apple products. So there’s your Mac OS, my friend :)
  2. [2] N.B.: In LaTeX, hyphen (-) is a single dash: -, en dash () is two dashes: --, and em dash (—) is three dashes: ---
Posted in Grammar Biatch | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Gettin’ all weird on y’all

With apologies to the entire southeastern United States for the title ;)

Seems like the only time I post these days is when something that’s been brewing in my head for months or years comes together as poorly-written prose, but I promise, I’m not getting all weird on anybody. Well, not any weirder than usual.

I work full time and, like a lot of people, I have this second job[1]when I get home. I’m fortunate enough to live with my best friend, so it’s not as if I have no one outside of work to talk to, but sometimes I have something I simply need to core dump that I’d rather not dump directly on the few external contacts I have at the moment.

And so it ends up here.

If my blatherings annoy you, the great thing about the Internet is that you can just stop reading. But rest assured, I’m not going nuts on anybody… sometimes, I just have stuff I need to say out loud, so to speak. This is as good a place as any.

  1. [1]
Posted in Life, Musings | Tagged | 1 Comment

On forgetting, forgiveness, and having a number of cheeks less than five

I think I’m finally ready to write this. I’ve tried many times before, but I think it’s finally ripe. (For values of ripe that do not include “sweaty and unwashed”, thankyouverymuch)

This started as a larger post about something bigger, but I think this is really what I’ve wanted to say on the subject, and the rest of it belongs somewhere else. Bear with me if you want, ignore if you don’t. My posts are too long-winded to read in the Twitter/Facebook world anyway, so I won’t be offended.

On forgetting, forgiveness, and having a number of cheeks less than five

I wish I could remember the exact quote, because I think it’s a really important point with respect to the idea that one must forgive and forget – but basically, it goes something like this: “Forgiveness is one thing; but if someone says you have a chip on your shoulder because you haven’t forgotten, they say that because you remembering is inconvenient to them.”

There’s a reason we remember things, even long after having forgiven or reconciled them. I think people can forget one-or-two time events, but they’re less likely to forget patterns of behavior. I don’t see how you can call that anything other than a survival mechanism; there’s a quote we’ve all heard attributed to a ton of people (Einstein, Kipling, Rita Mae Brown[1]): “This brings us to the definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.” I find it to be equally true that expecting someone to behave differently when there has been a long-standing, consistent pattern of behavior is, at best, a vain hope.

I have been forgiven in my life by many people, often when I didn’t deserve it. I fully recognize that people who forgive my more persistent personality quirks and failings are not pretending that whatever I’ve done hasn’t happened and that it will not happen again; rather, they accept that those things are part of who I am and 1) expect me to try to rein them in, 2) simply don’t let them bother them, or 3) expect that I will not/cannot rein them in and, if they find that unacceptable, avoid me.

I don’t get to choose which path they take. If I were to try to force a path on them – and I do not – I should fully expect that they will eventually get to option 3.

(Note: I try, very seriously, to work towards reining my own quirks in, even if the people in my life don’t always mind them.)

I cannot, however, expect people to forget things I may have done that hurt them in the past, regardless of whether or how they forgive me. No one has that right.

I can ask for forgiveness, but memories are part of what defines us, even when we don’t want them. They tell us someone can be trusted with our deepest hearts, or perhaps should not be. They tell us someone is dependable – or not. They teach us what we will accept from others in the future, and they give us hints about how to – and how not to – treat other people based upon how we felt in similar situations. Memories create both empathy and caution, and without those things, we would all hurt and be hurt over the same things again, and again, and again.

We’d all probably be psychotic, frankly.

So, sure, please do turn the other cheek – for as many cheeks as you have to spare. But you should neither kick nor let yourself be kicked in the head repeatedly.

Now, before you get the wrong idea, let me state very clearly that I believe in forgiveness.

Let me say that again – I believe in forgiveness. And I do forgive.

I think in holding grudges, in containing hatred and fear and disgust, you do little more than poison yourself. I think it’s important to try to understand why someone is they way he or she is, to try to understand the roots of their behavior, and to try to empathize with whatever they may have been through that made them that way. Forgiveness costs you nothing, I promise you.

And sometimes forgetting is worth it too.

But if you wipe the slate of memories clean every time you walk away from someone who either cannot or will not stop doing something that damages you – and you can do this, to a certain extent – then every time you come back to that person, if you do come back, you may find yourself in a sick cycle of rediscovery. Worse, you will find yourself reacting in ways you may no longer understand because you’ve pushed the context off into a corner of your head – the events don’t disappear when you try to wipe them away, and really, neither do the memories, no matter how much you may want them to.

And eventually, you will stop trying to forget because it is not in your interest to do so.

Puppies eventually cringe at the sight of newspapers, if you’re that kind of owner.

I let events from my past be rewritten again and again and again to the point that for certain periods of my life, I only had displaced memories of emotions and the consequences of events, but never of the events themselves. I was totally complicit in this, because I didn’t want to be the one accused of carrying a chip on my shoulder (as I was every time I reacted to anything), and frankly, because I wanted to move on. Letting my life be defined by memories of tough times wasn’t convenient for me either.

And then I started my own family.

Suddenly, it wasn’t about whether or not I could pretend. It was about whether or not I could be different from my past. I have a responsibility to people other than myself to be as good as the best of my examples and better than the worst of them.

I am not going to place blame or shame for things that happened when I was younger. What would be the point? I even understand why they happened. I always have, even if others involved would never give me credit for that.

I forgive most of it, if forgiveness is even necessary.

But the past did happen. Even if that is inconvenient to everyone involved. And some of us – those of us, for example, who now have to be parents and spouses and friends – now inherit the burden of making lessons of it for ourselves, for taking the paths that were good and ignoring – or even fighting – the paths that were bad. And we also have to take care of ourselves, in that we have to recognize when someone is going to hurt us, to take advantage of us, to cause us damage.

John Waters made the comment in an interview I watched recently[2] that you can blame your parents until you’re 30, but after 40, you need to stop whining and get on with it – after that, the die is cast and you deal with your lot. And he’s right.

I don’t think it’s that simple, and it takes some people longer than others, but I think the sentiment is the right one if you want to have a good life before you drop dead. If you want to make the most of what you’ve got left.

I think you can extend that idea to a lot of things, not just parents. You can extend it to bullies and bad breaks early in your career and exes and a lot of other things sufficiently distant in the past that the only good they really serve is to hand you a lesson from which you really need to move on.

My take on it is that at a certain point, if you’re still stuck in the miserable cycle of your youth or young adulthood with someone, you eventually have to simply start parenting yourself and get it over with, because no one else is going to. Not whoever you have standing in as a mother/father figure, not your spouse, and not your parents, no matter how much you love or respect them. No matter how much you want something from any of those people that they can’t give you.

Sounds creepy, I know, but really – at some point, you, as the adult, have to sit down with the little girl or boy in your head and do what you’d do with any kid you’d give advice to. If you have to sit down with the miserable 16-year-old you were and say, “look, this too will pass, it isn’t all your fault, and by the way, what Person X said about you is utter bullshit,” then do it. Even if Person X happens to be your actual parent.

It took me until I was 35 to do that. And the consequences of that upset some people, understandably, because suddenly, I was behaving differently. But for me, it was the freedom to define myself, finally. I was totally complicit in letting other people define me, and I still fight with that constantly, but the only way to stop that is to do it yourself.

You are not going to be able to stop other people from acting in ways that are part of their nature, or part of the dysfunctional cycle you’ve had going on with them for decades, or whatever. You may not even be able to stop yourself. The only power – and the main responsibility – you have is to try to deal with your part in the deal.

And part of that, often, involves not forgetting.

Even when it is inconvenient.

Good Lord, turning 40 is turning me maudlin and preachy. Next year, I start shaking my fist at the kids on the lawn. And I fully expect them to remember me doing it.

  1. [1] see http://www.quotationspage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=282
  2. [2] http://bigthink.com/ideas/24048
Posted in Life, Musings | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Exactly one way to skin a cat

Disclaimer: I like cats. I am not advocating skinning them or any other cat-unfriendly activities. Also, this is me whining about Germany. If such things bother you, move on.

It occurs to me that there is almost certainly no German equivalent for the English phrase, “There’s more than one way to skin a cat.”[1]

And that would be because here in Germany, there isn’t.

There is one, and only one, right way to do something. All other methods of getting something done are sloppy, inferior, or, quite possibly, don’t happen, even if you see them happen in front of your nose.

Now, much to the chagrin of people who talk to me, um, ever, my favourite example for almost anything stereotypically German is my mother-in-law — she is so German she makes normal Germans look, well, un-German, so it’s hard to resist. And she yet again fails to disappoint as an example here.

One day, when my in-laws were on one of their visits where I was unfortunate enough to still be in town, my in-laws came by while we were still eating dinner.

My MIL looked at us with big round eyes, astounded.

“What is THAT?!?!!??”

I had expected there to at least be a naked man or something in the kitchen, but, um, no.

She was apparently referring to food.

I looked at the table. There sat a dish my husband has made in her house since, approximately, the fall of the Holy Roman Empire. It couldn’t have been that surprising.

“Chicken curry,” I said, shrugging and going back to eating.

“No it isn’t!!!!” she insisted, her eyes still as round as saucers and her countenance slightly… offended?

“Yes, it is,” I said, perplexed, and went back to eating. I do try to ignore her, folks. I really, really do.

“No,” she insisted. “THAT,” she said, pointing to a dish on the stove, “is not chicken curry.”

“Ah, that,” I said, nodding toward the coffee cake I’d baked earlier that day. “That’s a coffee cake.”

“No, that can’t be.”

I raised my eyebrow at her. “It certainly is…”

“No, it can’t be. I’m quite certain that no one in Germany… what KIND of coffee cake is it?”

I am used to these bizarre conversations where she won’t believe water is wet if I say it is, but they tire me. If just having her in my kitchen is an insult to my intelligence, you can imagine why they are cordially invited to stay in a hotel when they visit.

So I sighed, poking at my dinner. “Yeast coffee cake. With streusel. Very normal.”

Her eyes got round again.

You’d have thought I’d just revealed that I was dabbling in prostitution for extra cash.

(Note to self: remember to casually drop line about prostitution into conversation next time I am forced to talk to ILs.)

“But… but…” she spluttered. “I am QUITE certain – QUITE certain – that no one in Germany would ever make a coffee cake in THAT. That would never happen, I am sure of it.”

All I could think was, “Are you shitting me?”

See, we moved to Germany with almost nothing and inherited a lot of dishes from excess parental supply/dead grandmothers/overzealous Schnäppchenjagd (bargain hunting with a fearsome German flavor) at the Aldi. It was like the usual hodge-podge of cast-offs your typical grad student has in his kitchen before he is flush enough to acquire quality kitchenware.

Big. Fucking. Deal. We’re flexible. We go with the flow.

But see, I had made a coffee cake in – horror of horrors – a casserole dish. As one does, when one does not have a cake or loaf pan. It tasted great.

It was also, apparently, an abomination. My mother-in-law blathered about this for a bit, boggling the crap out of my mind, and then looked at me oddly.

“Can I have some?”

She took a bite. Apparently it didn’t offend, though she didn’t say so.

This was then followed by, “I didn’t know you liked yeast cake! I like yeast cake,” said in a tone of voice that said I had somehow offended her by deigning to have preferences she hadn’t already decided I had, and worse that they agreed with hers.

And then, “But I’m quite sure no one in Germany would EVER make a cake in that!!!”

I just did, lady. Check the map.

I place this under failure of imagination.

Now before I make a broad generalisation about an entire culture, let me just state that I am not making a broad generalisation about an entire culture. Which I am, but, well, I’m not.

I work in academia, where a failure of imagination can be fatal. My colleagues aren’t really like this. Many younger people aren’t like this. I suspect most Germans in creative professions aren’t like this. I just run into this mentality so often when I’m out and about in the world that it’s impossible not to note its ubiquity.

So to all Germans who are flexible, creative, open-minded, I am really sorry about this post. I like you. You can come over for casserole-dish coffee cake any time. I promise coffee is served in actual coffee cups. Or possibly tea cups. You can adjust, I’m sure.

BUT:

When I revealed to a (very nice) gentleman of about my age that I make a horrible housewife, so I am not one, and I certainly don’t iron, he looked totally confused.

“Yes, of course, but ironing must happen.”

Nuh-uh. Not at my house.

It was implied in his shrug of understanding that ironing happens anyway, and that it happens through the power of me, though I also work full time, just as my husband does. If this is the case, I presume my hired elves[2] do it while we sleep. It must, because ironing not happening is impossible.

(Don’t get me started on ironing – I’ve watched the neighbor women iron the family underwear outside on sunny days, and let me just say, before you get any ideas, that we Grothoffs? We wear wrinkled underwear. Totally unironed. How’s that for abomination, Germany?)

I CAN iron. I don’t. I tend to burn myself and it takes me too long. So it does NOT, in fact, happen.

Failure of imagination.

And then – and this was related to me by my husband after his last trip up to visit with Torsten – my MIL sliced her hand open on a small sharp knife which was pointing up in the silverware container of the dishwasher. My husband suggested, wisely, that she load them point-down, as we do, to avoid mutilation. She responded immediately, still bleeding, rejecting the idea – this is not done because it will break the silverware container.

Yes, because a silverware container is harder to replace than a hand.

Failure of imagination.

Wearing a ripped T-shirt as a pajama top? Nooo. Ripped clothes are horrifying! (Note that worn T-shirts make great soft pajamas for little boys who get bad eczema and are uncomfortable at night.)

Eating a piece of bread with two hands because there’s something on it which is threatening to fall off? Noooo. We eat bread with one hand. Always. That is the one true way.

I use my detachable bicycle basket, often, to bring stuff in to the office. It’s convenient. And on the way home, I use it to pick up groceries when I pick my bike up at the station. I don’t know why, but the fact that I have it with me but did not bike to work (only as far as the station before I took the bus) always throws people. I don’t understand what’s so weird about that – it’s just functional. It’s intended for carrying things, and I use it for stuff. It doesn’t have to have a predefined single use. It’s not like I’m using it as a toilet.

There is exactly one way to skin a cat, eat bread, load a dishwasher, care for your clothes, teach your children, live your life.

You go to school, get degrees, get a job for life, retire, and take a lot of vacations. That is how it is supposed to be, and if you’ve done anything else, something is wrong.

Except that for my generation, things are changing – people don’t generally have lifetime jobs because the world doesn’t work that way anymore. And so maybe there’s hope, born of necessity.

But even with that kind of change, for someone who has led a flexible, varied life, Germany is a real challenge. This is a hard place to be creative – it can be narrow, critical and aggressive – and I admire the people who manage in spite of it. Because in Germany, there is exactly one way to skin a cat, and there are people who are remarkably confused – sometimes even unnecessarily hostile – if you do it a different way.

  1. [1] Edit: 9/23/11 – I stand by what I’ve said here, but it appears that a nearly identical idiom to “All roads lead to Rome” (“Viele Wege führen nach Rom“) does exist. I’m just not convinced many people here believe it ;)
  2. [2] Possibly this one – He broods, irons and slays beasts on the balcony.
Posted in Life, Musings | 4 Comments